2-5 in the NCAAM Tournament is unbelievably bad and of course the PAC 12 detractors in the media are having a field day. Unless Oregon or Utah do really really well, it aint looking good. My question to my fellow posters is what happened? I get Cal because they lost two of their best players and they do not have much depth. But, I'm a bit of a college basketball junkie and I've watched ACC, Big Ten, Big Twelve, SEC, Big East and even the A 10 conference basketball all season, along with watching every UA game and many other PAC 12 games and I really believe the level of play in the PAC 12 is equal or better than all other conferences except the ACC. I'm baffled. What do others think the reasons are for our poor performance as a conference in the first round and Matt please weigh in.
What's Up With the PAC 12
- Thread starter hmuir
- Start date
